Build the AI-native Engineering org, with Tetriz

It moves every engineer up the AI adoption curve, so AI stops being a pilot and starts being how the team ships

AI Impact dashboard

Four stages, one direction

Tetriz maps where every engineer is on the AI curve, and moves them up

Experimenting

A few engineers experimenting

No org-wide picture of who's using what

Adopting

Most engineers have a license

Use is uneven, no one knows what's working

Mastering

AI is in the daily loop

Quality and ROI are tracked, tooling decisions are data-driven

Leading

AI is how the team ships

Adoption is universal, ROI is reported to finance every week

Three signals that turn AI use into engineering craft

Saturation

Catch sessions running out of context before they ship broken code

Saturation dashboard

Prompt quality

Coach prompts toward clarity, specificity, and grounding, at the session level

Prompt quality dashboard

Effective sessions

Surface which sessions actually shipped code, and which got abandoned

Effective sessions dashboard

The agentic platform

Coming soon

Tetriz is an agentic platform, four agents pull these levers, each running a different engineering job

Meet the four agents
The agentic platform dashboard

The proof, in adoption, impact, and ROI

Three layers of numbers, all moving in the same direction

Adoption

How much engineering work AI is actually doing, across every tool in use.

  • % PRs attributable to AI
  • % code (LOC) attributable to AI
  • % issues closed with AI
  • Coding-tools split across Cursor, Claude, Copilot, Codex
Adoption dashboard

Impact

Whether AI made engineers faster and code better, or just added more of it.

  • PR review TAT, pre vs post AI
  • First-pass merge rate on AI code
  • Code churn on AI-attributed code
  • Bugs traceable to AI sessions
Impact dashboard

ROI

Engineering hours saved, rolled up to dollars finance can read.

  • Time recovered per engineer
  • Loaded cost per engineer
  • Dollar savings, org-wide
  • Auditable methodology card for finance
ROI dashboard

Every engineer becomes AI-native, one session at a time

Personal Leverage Scores from real merged PRs, with prescriptive coaching on what to sharpen each session

[QUALITY]

Input Quality Scorecard

Six-dimension prompt quality per session, 7-day trend, weak spots flagged.

[ATTRIBUTION]

Session-to-PR linkage

Tracks which AI sessions produced which merged code. No manual tagging.

[EFFICIENCY]

Token-waste visibility

Surfaces where tokens burn without value, week over week.

[COACHING]

Personal coaching

Strongest dimension surfaced first. Targeted suggestions on what to lean into next.

One connection, reads every tool

Role-based access, audited connections, zero new policy

Cursor
Cursor
Claude Code
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot
Codex
Codex
Kiro
Kiro
Antigravity
Antigravity
GitHub
GitLab
Bitbucket
Jira
Linear
Linear
Confluence
Confluence
Slack
Google Workspace

Per engineer pricing

Lite

Coming Soon
$9/seat/month

Bring Your Own Key (BYOK) model.

  • All four agents
  • Coding, Issue, and PR connectors
  • Bring your own LLM API key
  • Email support

Pro

Recommended
$29/seat/month

Tetriz-hosted LLM, end to end.

  • Everything in Lite, plus:
  • Tetriz-hosted LLM access
  • SSO (Google / Microsoft)
  • Audit log

Max

$49/seat/month

Google Workspace and Slack signals.

  • Everything in Pro, plus:
  • Google Workspace connector
  • Slack connector
  • Priority support

Enterprise

Custom

For 100+ engineer orgs and bespoke needs.

  • Everything in Max, plus:
  • SAML / Okta SSO
  • Multiple concurrent connectors
  • Org-wide attribution
  • Custom data export
  • Dedicated support agent

What CTOs and Leaders told us

And why we built Tetriz

Make me a hero in board meetings. That's a $50K product.

CTO · Series C startup

People expect magic. You must now do what you did yesterday with one-tenth of the people.

CTO · Fintech, >$1Bn TPV

You don't want to measure the quality of input. You want to measure the quality of output.

CTO · Developer Tools platform

We are doing a lot of stuff but are blind on effectiveness.

VP Eng · Enterprise SaaS

I don't have a good way of doing metrics-based AI analysis. It is definitely vague right now.

CTO · B2B SaaS

There's a year-on-year productivity increase you need to show. 20%. You can't just say they're now writing 120 lines of code.

TPM · FAANG

The primary bottleneck is code reviews. We need ways to speed this up.

Engineering Leader · B2B SaaS

Specific instructions were given. They didn't do it. Just generated some code, it's working, so they just push it.

Engineering Leader · Mid-market SaaS

Right now there is no tool. I have to manually go and ask the status. I have to actually follow up.

Engineering Leader · Enterprise

DORA is not enough. We need a post-shipment quality metric.

Engineering Leader cohort synthesis