Corrections policy

Send the article URL, the disputed statement, and any supporting evidence to support@tetriz.ai. A specific source, calculation, screenshot, or reproduction path helps us assess the concern. Reports about commercial criticism and product comparisons follow the same standard as other editorial content.

• The concern is checked against the cited source, the underlying calculation, and the product behaviour relevant to the article. Time-sensitive claims are evaluated using evidence from the period described.
• The author or an appropriate subject-matter reviewer determines whether the issue changes a fact, an interpretation, or the article's central conclusion.
• Evidence is weighed by relevance and authority, not by the reporter's relationship to Tetriz. Where credible sources disagree, the article represents the disagreement and narrows its conclusion.

• A material factual error is corrected in the article and described in a visible update note. The note states what changed and why without repeating inaccurate information unnecessarily.
• The article's updated date changes when the correction materially affects its meaning, evidence, or recommendation. The original publication date remains unchanged.
• Spelling, grammar, formatting, and link-maintenance edits do not receive a correction note or a new updated date when they leave the substance intact.
• If a linked source changes after publication but the original statement was accurate, the article may add context or replace the link without describing the earlier text as an error.

An article may be withdrawn when its central evidence is unreliable and the conclusion cannot be repaired through a correction. The page identifies the withdrawal and its reason so an existing link does not silently disappear.