Fewer attempts per task
The agent knows your conventions on the first pass rather than the fourth. Much of what looks like a model limitation is an agent rediscovering something settled months ago.
More of what your org knows, working in every session.
Your agents begin each task knowing the code and nothing else — not the convention this service follows, not the approach your team tried last quarter and abandoned. Enterprise Memory captures what your organisation has already worked out and puts it in front of the agent, so nobody pays to establish it a second time.
Memory · org
Attempts / task
-38%
Tokens / PR
-24%
Days to first PR
4
Conventions84%
Decisions62%
Practices49%
Share of relevant sessions served from organisational memory
What changes with memory.
Today
- The agent learns your conventions on the fourth attempt, every time
- The next engineer types the same explanation, and you pay for it again
- A new joiner spends weeks rediscovering decisions the org already made
With Tetriz
- Conventions known on the first pass
- One explanation, stored once, arriving automatically
- Day-one agents that already know your architecture
How knowledge stuck in people's heads starts doing work.
Four steps, and the first one asks nothing of anyone.
Capture it from work that already happened
Every attempt to write this down by hand fails the same way: the people who know are the people with no time to document it.
What Tetriz does here
- Read from merged work, reverts and reviews
Two kinds emerge — how work gets done here, and what has been decided and why.
- Nothing to write and nothing to file
Coverage grows as you ship rather than as someone finds an afternoon.
| Holds | From | |
|---|---|---|
| Procedural | Conventions and practices | Repositories and merged history |
| Factual | Decisions and what was tried | Reverts and review decisions |
The two kinds of memory, and the work each is read from
Put it where the work happens
Knowledge that has to be looked up is only as good as the moment someone thinks to look, which is reliably after the mistake.
What Tetriz does here
- Arrives as part of the task
The agent has it before it starts, without anyone remembering to attach it.
- Scoped to where it applies
A rule for one service does not leak into another, so more knowledge does not mean more noise.
Memory coverage by type
Conventions84%
Decisions62%
Practices49%
Sessions served from memory
Trust only what held up
A confidently written note that turned out to be wrong is worse than no note, because the agent will act on it.
What Tetriz does here
- Graded on what shipped and survived
Something becomes standard when work that relied on it merged and held, not when someone asserted it.
- Replaced things are marked as replaced
So a superseded decision stops being served as if it were current.
Memory by confidence
Provisional38%
Firming43%
Standard19%
Stop repeating the attempts you already rejected
The approach your team tried and abandoned is the single thing an agent is most likely to propose again, because from the code it looks untried.
What Tetriz does here
- Abandoned approaches are kept, not deleted
The dead end is more useful than most of what succeeded, because it is the one an agent will walk into.
- So the same wrong turn stops recurring
Across teams and across quarters, without anyone having to have been in the original conversation.
Delivery outcomes
Repeat attempts
-71%
Reverts
-18%
Days to first PR
4
Where the return actually shows up.
Three places, all of them things you already measure.
Lower spend for the same output
Every time an engineer re-supplies context the org already holds, that is billable work producing nothing new. Storing it once removes the charge for good.
And people become productive sooner
A new engineer's agent starts with the architecture and the landmines, so the first few weeks stop being an archaeology exercise.
Questions leaders ask about Enterprise Memory.
No. It is built from merged work, reverts and review decisions — material your organisation already produces as a by-product of shipping.
Durable technical and process facts about your codebase, tooling and conventions. Never secrets or credentials, never customer or production data, never personal information — and redaction happens as it is captured rather than afterwards.
Anything replaced is marked as replaced, and nothing becomes standard until work relying on it shipped and held. A claim no work ever confirmed is not treated as settled.
Yes — view, edit and delete. Edit matters most, because the thing worth fixing is a memory that is subtly wrong rather than one that merely exists.
It works from what you ship, so it covers the things documentation usually misses — why an approach was rejected, who owns what, which convention applies where.