Editorial policy

• Every article names its author and links to a permanent profile that describes the author's role, experience, and areas of expertise.
• The author keeps the article focused on the stated question and separates adjacent questions that need different evidence or a dedicated guide.
• A reviewer is credited only after a substantive factual or technical review. Routine copy editing does not earn a reviewer credit.

• Measured figures identify the source, relevant period, unit of analysis, and limitations that could change how a reader interprets the result.
• Externally sourced claims link to the original research, official documentation, or the most authoritative source available to us.
• Illustrative examples, hypothetical calculations, and observed results are labelled distinctly. We do not present an example organisation or modelled outcome as customer evidence.
• Product claims describe capabilities available when the article is published. Screenshots and workflow descriptions are updated when a product change would otherwise make the explanation misleading.

Articles may discuss problems Tetriz addresses or link to a relevant product capability. That commercial relationship does not change our standards for evidence and attribution. Comparisons describe the evaluated scope and do not claim that one product is universally better when the evidence supports a narrower conclusion.

• The updated date changes after a meaningful factual, methodological, or analytical revision. Cosmetic edits and link maintenance do not reset it.
• A material error follows the corrections policy and receives a visible note explaining what changed. An article whose central evidence cannot be repaired may be withdrawn.